![]() |
Selected Abstracts from the Third EPUAP Open Meeting |
|
KNOWLEDGE AND EFFECTIVENESS Inge C. Buss MHS, RN and Ruud J.G. Halfens PhD Pressure sore prevention was, and still is an important issue in the Netherlands. In 1985 the guidelines Pressure sore consensus were developed at the request of the CBO, a national organization for quality assurance in health care. These guidelines were revised in 1992 into the guidelines Revision Pressure Sore Consensus. The information of the guidelines is meant to be used in daily nursing practice, to improve nursing acting with regard to the in prevention of pressure sores. For this reason it is important that health care workers have knowledge about the content of this guidelines. It is known from previous studies, however, that nurses knowledge about pressure sore prevention is not adequate (Halfens & Eggink, 1995; Hill. 1992; Pieper & Mott, 1995), Therefore it was decided to investigate to what extent knowledge about the effectiveness of preventive interventions described in the guidelines, is available by enrolled nurses in Dutch nursing homes. The questionnaire developed by Halfens et al was used in this study. This questionnaire was distributed in twenty-three nursing homes in the Netherlands to a convenience sample of enrolled nurses, enrolled nurses in charge, physicians, and members of the management team. The results of this study will be presented at the conference. PREVENTING PRESSURE ULCERS DURING AND POST SURGERY Maarten J. Lubbers Before, during and post surgery, the patient is at risk due to immobility, circulation disorders and other problems resulting in hypoxia, necrosis and pressure ulcers. The relationship between operating room table surfaces and pressure ulcers is well known, but there is a wide variance in the frequency: pressure ulcer development has been reported to range from 12% to 17%1,2,3,4,5. Most pressure damage could be prevented and it is important to have prevention and educational strategies in place6,7. Three strategies are necessary: preoperative, peroperative and postoperative. Preoperative: Identify at risk patients, Risk factors are well known (table 1) and the use of scoring systems well established (table 2). Risk assessment should be used as an adjunct to clinical judgement. Peroperative: Little information is available on the genesis of intra-operative pressure ulcers1*8, but several risk factors are identified (table 1). A complicating factor is that these intra-operative lesions are usually not evident until several days postoperative1,9,10. Postoperative: Use the best available products and mobilize the patient as quickly as possible. The problem is that pre- and post surgery the use of dynamic devices is feasible in high risk patients, but during surgery static devices are preferred to insure stability at the surgical site4,5,10. Table 1: Risk factors
Table 2: Scoring systems
References
|
||
| Previous Page | Return to Top | Return to Index |
|
© European Pressure Ulcer Advisory
Panel, 2001
Contact Us |
||